Posts

A vintage overview

2010 had a late start to the vintage, but a warm April and May meant that things were nicely back on track by mid-spring, although a hailstorm in St Estèphe had a significant effect.  Luckily, at this point in the year, the impact is on quantity, not quality and for me, many St Estèphe properties made some of the best wines of the vintage.

Early June was cool and rainy, which again affected yields, but from mid-June onwards it was virtually perfect weather, with warm and sunny but not overly hot weather throughout July and most of August.  A small amount of early September rain enabled the grapes to continue to ripen well into September and October.

In many ways, 2010 was at its most perfect at harvest.  Ideal weather, with plenty of sunshine and warm but not overly hot temperatures, and cooler nights than in 2009, led to wonderful ripening conditions, especially for Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot.  For me, it is a vintage that I prefer to 2009, being fresher and more classic, but, to be honest,

What follows is a personal viewpoint, and one focused on drinking pleasure, rather than investment value.

Pessac-Léognan

In 2009 it was this commune that was the star of the reds.  What a difference a year makes.  Many had green tannins, and virtually all had high to very high alcohol, with both Haut-Brion and La Mission Haut-Brion topping out at a declared 15%.  It must be said that for them, it succeeded, with rich ripe fruit and an underlying minerality and freshness, coupled with a beautiful silky texture; smooth, supple and long finish, and stunning balance.  The Haut-Brion remains too young, but it will be a lovely wine.  Of the rest, only Château de Fieuzal and Domaine de Chevalier impressed me, the latter showing its typical balance, elegant form and a restrained 13.5% alcohol that showed many others that bigger is no guarantee of better.

Margaux

To my delight, Margaux returned to the form I would expect, after a frankly disappointing 2009, and this page of my tasting book is littered with technical terms such as “lovely” and “yum” and little stars to show I liked it.  The whole commune seemed to produce the elegant, perfumed wines for which they are so justly renowned, and it is hard to pick a favourite.  Chateau Margaux itself needs time and air, as it was showing some reduction (easily cured by decanting), but had all the perfume, elegance and finesse I have longed to see in it.  Some others worthy of mention were Boyd-Cantenac, elegant and floral with balanced tannins and a lovely lift; Cantenac Brown, which was a study in balance and elegance; Ferrière, which outperformed itself in 2010 with a long elegant (that word again) finish and beautiful balance; Chateau d’Issan, which was perhaps a little lighter than the others but still lovely; and Chateau Palmer which showed great richness and subtlety at the same time and was once again my favourite of the commune

St-Julien

This is probably the first time in many years of tasting that I have really got a proper sense of the commune of St-Julien and of what it is capable.  The wines are ripe, fruity, and for the most part elegant, with a finesse that lifts this vintage above previous years.  Balance on almost all was perfect.  Unsurprisingly, Léoville-Las Cases was one of the two stars, although it had, as always, an intensity and linearity more typical of Pauillac than St-Julien.  Its neighbour, Léoville-Barton, was the other, with a lovely fruit, a stunning balance, supple and silky texture, and a long, complex finish.  If I was buying one wine this vintage for sheer pleasure, it would be this one.  Its sister property, Langoa-Barton, was also marked by elegance, finesse and complexity.  Many others are also worthy of note, including in particular Beychevelle and Branaire-Ducru.  One word of warning is that Léoville-Poyferré I found overly bretty (brettanomyces, a yeast, which can add complexity, but can also leave a bitterness and a farmyard-y smell).  Those who are less sensitive to brett may not mind it; those who are more should avoid at all costs.

Pauillac

Pauillac was characterised in 2010 by subtle and complex aromas and flavours, a long finish, and still firm tannins.  These wines will last and last (for the most part).  The wine of the commune is without a doubt Chateau Lafite-Rothschild.  It has a lovely nose of dark fruit, with some vanilla, licorice and spice, coupled with one of the most lovely balances of the structural elements of a wine I can imagine – acid, alcohol, flavours and tannin are all perfect.  It is astonishingly long and supple, with a lovely lingering finish.  This is a wine that will live on in the memory for years, and I felt privileged to have tasted it.  Chateau Mouton-Rothschild was also lovely, with elegance and finesse, but it was the Lafite that stood out.

Of the rest, my favourite was Pichon-Lalande.  Initially, especially tasting it after the (also wonderful but much bigger) Pichon-Baron, it feels underwhelming, but then it creeps up on you, slowly revealing itself with huge complexity and length, lovely elegance and a stunning finish.  Grand-Puy-Lacoste is also worth investigation, with complexity and elegance beyond its norm.

St-Estèphe

As I mentioned above, St-Estèphe suffered a severe hailstorm in 2010, which fortunately came at the “right” time (if there is ever such), reducing yields but not hurting quality, and the impact on the wines has for the most part appeared favourable.  Parker gave the 2009 Cos d’Estournel 100 points, and “only” 97 to the 2010, but for me, it is by far the better wine, with beautifully balanced alcohol and acidity, firm but supple tannins, and an elegance that the 2009 was lacking.  Calon-Segur is also a lovely wine, more approachable than might be expected, and Montrose is classic St-Estèphe, with dark fruit and cedary notes, firm and yet silky tannins.

St-Emilion

In 2009, the right bank wines I found singularly disappointing with only a few worthy of consideration, virtually all of these in St-Emilion.  This year, was, thankfully, much different.  Almost all showed lovely fruit, with ripe tannins.  A few descended into jamminess, and Troplong-Mondot at 16% alcohol was one of the worst, but most achieved a balance of flavour, alcohol and acid.  Angelus was lovely, with great balance and finesse, although I was a little disappointed with the Cheval Blanc.  Particularly worthy of note were Figeac, Belair-Monange and Canon-La Gaffelière.

Pomerol

Again, 2010 was a much better year for Pomerol, although by no means equally displayed across the commune.  Of the best, Chateau Lafleur-Pétrus had a beautiful ripe nose, lovely balance, a full mouthfeel and, once again, elegance.  Chateau Petit-Village was also lovely: my notes for this say simply “STUNNING!!!” while Trotanoy and Clinet were both supple, elegant, lifted and “lovely”.

Sauternes and Barsac

Sauternes produced a very good and consistent vintage in 2010.  Virtually every producer made a good wine, as one producer rather mockingly noted to me tasting a wine he does not normally rate.  It did not, however, have the tension, the intensity, the complexity and the excitement of 2009.  Chateau d’Yquem is, of course, stunning: complex and interesting.  Of the rest, Guiraud was my favourite, with a complex and intense smokiness lifted by grapefruit and marmalade notes.

Wine Fraud – NOT a Wine Auction Problem

In the past months, the issue of wine fraud in the fine and rare wine industry has blown up in the media and on the internet. Some of my industry insider colleagues and I have been awaiting attention on the matter for over a decade, but not in the manner that we have seen. Unfortunately, the frenzied atmosphere surrounding the FBI’s  first ever arrest of an alleged fine and rare wine counterfeiter Rudy Kurniawan in March, has served to  confuse rather than clarify the most common sources of fake wine in the U.S.

The simple fact is that despite what is written on wine boards and in some of the media articles that have come out since Kurniawan’s arrest, fine and rare wine fraud is not only an auction issue: In fact in the past 6 years, since I started my own company, most of the fakes I have seen have come from brokers and retailers. Interestingly, they are often the same brokers and retailers that were originally the source of wines I refused while working as a wine auction specialist for the 6 years before I started Chai Consulting.  (This includes refusing a consignment from Kurniawan in 2002 – never to be offered wine from him again!)  Most of the fakes we are aware of are from a very few sources and the US Government is working towards choking off those sources.

Fortunately, the FBI has started cleaning up the industry starting with the arrest and indictment of Kurniawan, an Indonesian born Chinese man whose real name is allegedly, Zhen Wang Huang.  He is charged with wine counterfeiting as well as financial fraud and is concurrently being sued in civil court for counterfeiting by avid wine collector and anti-wine-fraud crusader, Bill Koch.  The FBI is actively pursuing other parties on the wine fraud front, and I expect more indictments in the near future.

What is known is that a significant wine counterfeiting operation was found in Kurniawan’s home at the time of his arrest. He is known to have sold significant amounts of wine at the wine auction house, Acker Merrall & Condit in New York City since at least 2003. In 2006 alone he sold $35 million at two single seller sales through Acker in New York City. The man in charge of Acker Merrall & Condit, John Kapon, not only failed to attain proper provenance for Kurniawan’s wines but he also either bought a tall tale hook-line-and-sinker or helped create the fraud monster with colorful consignment introductions like this from an April 2005 auction:

AMAZING GRACE

There is not much that can be said about this collection, outside of the fact that it is one of America’s greatest. Years have been spent carefully acquiring the best of the best of the best, and there is probably not a single, great wine of the 20th century that this collector has not had on multiple occasions. This is a collector that actually inspects his wine. I have seen many a collector of old and rare wines never even look at the bottles they have acquired, even if they are wines that merit careful inspection. Over the years, and after seeing numerous counterfeit wines, this collector takes exceptional pride in the bottles he has acquired and the quality of his collection. This collector is so sure of the quality of his cellar, that if any buyer has any issues with any of the bottles, he told me, ‘Just have them send it back.’…When I got to the Latour à Pomerol case, I called him and told him that it almost looked too good as the case was in such excellent condition, and despite the corks being branded properly and the labels and capsules being correct, I kept asking questions. Finally he said, ‘Look, just open up a bottle. ….Don’t worry, he actually has just under three cases, all from the same importer and in his possession for decades,and he is replacing the bottle.

(http://www.ackerwines.com/catalogs/pdf_catalogs/05-4/05-4-FIRST_SESSION.pdf

page 45,  SATURDAY, APRIL 23, 2005                             FIRST SESSION, LOTS 1-613

AT CRU, 24 FIFTH AVENUE (9th Street)                          BEGINNING PROMPTLY AT 10:00AM EDT)

The problem with this introduction is that Rudy was born in 1976, so in April 2005, he was maximum 29 years old. Either this introduction is a complete Acker fabrication, or Rudy was the most prolific toddler buyer of fine and rare wine in history – this is if he “actually ha(d) just under three cases, all from the same importer and in his possession for decades.” And to have this quantity of what is largely considered a “Holy Grail” wine by old-time collectors – is preposterous without documentation. There is no way a responsible auction house would have written, much less sold this wine without a paper trail substantiating the provenance.  In 2008, Laurent Ponsot of the esteemed burgundy house Domaine Ponsot had to appear in the sale room to ensure that Acker did not sell $700,000 – $1.3 million of wines that were never produced by his family’s domaine. That wine was also consigned by Rudy Kurniawan. Rudy was elusive about the source of the wines, eventually giving Mr. Ponsot some bogus phone numbers to a strip mall and an airline in Indonesia.

In February of this year, Spectrum / Vanquish, a wine auction partnership out of Irvine, California and London respectively, had a disastrous sale anchored by a consignment of Kurniawan’s wines.   Despite knowledge of the source of the wines and inspection by “Senior Consultant and Strategic Advisor” at Spectrum, Kevin Swersey, with whom I worked at Zachys and who as far back as 2002 was aware of Rudy being a ‘problem consignor’, and Vanquish head man Richard Brierley, who has always seemed to have a high level of knowledge, they let some very bad bottles pass inspection and get offered for sale.  Some of those bottles were spotted and called out in advance on the Wineberserker.com bulletin board by LA attorney and burgundy collector, Don Cornwell.  Major burgundy producers Domaine de la Romanee Conti via their importer Corney & Barrow and Domaine Dujac both requested bottles be withdrawn from the sale based on Cornwell’s reporting. So yes – there are some houses that appear to deserve the scorn. But these are the anomalies.

The vilification of wine auctions as an industry that has failed in its duty of due diligence based only on these widely reported situations is regrettably, understandable, but extremely unwarranted. As someone who has been dealing with wine fraud for over a decade – these bad eggs are not indicative of the larger industry. When I read blogs, wine boards and articles that vilify auctions, all I can think of is how inaccurate these representations are of the fine and rare wine auction industry in which I frequently work. The amount of fake wine that has come out of retailers in the US, and in Europe is very significant, as are the many multi-million dollar sales Kurniawan made to individual collectors that did not pass through auction, despite the reports that some may have been brokered by an auction house.

This does not even take into account the wide spread fraud in, and into, Asia. It is speculated that for some years those few less scrupulous auction houses have been offloading fakes into the Asian market where US investigators are less likely to look, or prosecute, and where the buyers are perhaps less informed….  Again, these activities seem to be ascribed to the same small list of shady characters.

For those interested in buying fine and rare wines, reputable wine auctions remain a great and viable venue for both sales and purchases. The vast majority of major auction houses in the US and Europe are full of competent and dedicated professionals who want the issue of fraud to be rectified as badly as I.  They have honest, hardworking owners, directors and specialists who have no reason to want to sell fake wines as the buyers are just as much clients as are the sellers.  After all, without buyers, there is no sale.

Auction specialists are frequently far more knowledgeable and responsible about vetting old and rare wines than are many retailers and brokers. Some brokers don’t even ever see the bottles they are selling: Everything is done via email, and the end product ends up in a buyer’s possession with little oversight. There are retailers out there offering wines that are so inconsistent with authentic examples that they make even amateurs laugh.  Some of these retailers sell huge quantities of wine, and hide behind ignorance despite decades of experience. To date the pressure is not yet on these suspect retailers, but it should be. I have seen retailers take back ‘bad bottles’ only to reoffer them  – but none of these stories are ruminating in the press and on the boards. I sincerely hope that things will change with future prosecutions. Of course there are great retailers as well, and many with whom I am happy to do considerable business.

The fact remains that in any industry there are some shady characters. My advice: Avoid them.  It does not matter “how good of a deal” you think you are getting, or “how well” someone may treat you. If they are defrauding you – stop doing business with them, or expect to be defrauded. Trust good companies and ask questions about provenance!

Recommend wine auctions companies, in no particular order:  Christies, Zachys Wine Auctions, Heritage Wine Auctions, Hart Davis Hart, Sothebys, Bonhams

Recommend retailers in the US other than those with auction houses previously mentioned: K&L Wine Merchants, CA,     Noe Valley Wine Merchant, SF, CA, Vin Vino Wine, Palo Alto, CA, Dee Vine Wines, SF, CA, Hi Times, Costa Mesa, CA,The Wine House, West Los Angeles, CA, Carmel Wines, CA, Crush, NYC, Morrell & Co, NYC, Sherry Lehmann, NYC, Astor Wines NYC

Jancis Robinson, MW, jancisrobinson.com, has graciously given her very personal list of UK merchants and traders from whom she would buy, or has bought, rareties : Berry Bros, Bibendum, Bordeaux Index, Corney & Barrow, Farr Vintners, Four Walls,Goedhuis, Justerini & Brook, Magnum, Reid Wines, Roberson, Seckford, Tanners, Turville Valley, Uncorked, Wilkinson Vintners, Wine Society, Peter Wylie

May 2012 – Owner and founder of Chai Consulting, Maureen Downey has teamed up with WineSearcher.com to write a monthly column on the inner-workings of the fine and rare wine market.  Downey, a veteran of wine industry, will tap her deep knowledge of everything wine to bring you a fresh, insider’s perspective.  Look for her articles in the “Features” section at www.winesearcher.com.  In the coming months Maureen will respond to reader queries on collecting, cellaring and authentication. Please email your detailed query, and Maureen’s responses will be posted on Wine-Searcher.